{"product_id":"pacific-power-paradox-american-statecraft-and-the-fate-of-the-asian-peace-9780300257281","title":"Pacific Power Paradox: American Statecraft and the Fate of the Asian Peace","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cblockquote\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003eThe countries of Asia-Pacific have managed to avoid war among nations since 1979, but America's statecraft has hindered more durable forms of security and inadvertently embrittled peace. Van Jackson argues that the United States has been both a bulwark against instability and a threat to Asian peace, and that by grappling with how America fits into the Asian story, regional stability has diminished and America's margin for geopolitical error is less now than ever before. \u003c\/blockquote\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFormat\u003c\/strong\u003e: Hardback\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLength\u003c\/strong\u003e: 312 pages\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublication date\u003c\/strong\u003e: 06 January 2023\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePublisher\u003c\/strong\u003e: Yale University Press\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAfter more than a century of recurring conflict, the countries of the Asia-Pacific region have managed something remarkable: avoiding war among nations. Since 1979, Asia has endured threats, near-miss crises, and nuclear proliferation but no interstate war. How fragile is this \"Asian peace,\" and what is America's role in it?\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eVan Jackson argues that because Washington takes for granted that the United States is a force for good, successive presidencies have failed to see how their statecraft impedes more durable forms of security and inadvertently embitters peace. At times, the United States has been the region's bulwark against instability, but America has been a threat to Asian peace as much as it has been its guarantor. By grappling with how America fits into the Asian story, Jackson shows how regional stability has diminished because of U.S. choices, and why America's margin for geopolitical error is less now than ever before.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe United States has played a paradoxical role in the history of Asian peace since 1979. On the one hand, the country has been a significant force for stability in the region, providing security and economic assistance to its Asian partners. On the other hand, the United States has also been a source of tension and conflict in the region, particularly with China and North Korea.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOne of the key factors contributing to the stability of the Asia-Pacific region since 1979 has been the United States' commitment to regional security. The country has established a network of military bases and alliances in the region, including the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). These alliances have helped to deter aggression and promote peace and stability in the region.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, the United States' commitment to regional security has also been a source of tension and conflict. For example, the country's involvement in the Vietnam War and the subsequent occupation of South Vietnam led to a long-term resentment towards the United States in the region. Similarly, the United States' support for Taiwan has been a source of tension with China, which claims sovereignty over the island.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAnother factor contributing to the stability of the Asia-Pacific region has been the United States' economic influence. The country has been a major investor in the region, providing capital and technology to help develop its economies. This has helped to promote economic growth and reduce poverty, which has contributed to a more stable and peaceful region.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, the United States' economic influence has also been a source of tension and conflict. For example, the country's trade policies have been criticized for favoring American companies and harming Asian economies. Additionally, the United States' military presence in the region has been seen as a threat by some countries, particularly those in the Middle East.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eDespite these challenges, the United States has continued to play a significant role in the history of Asian peace. The country has worked to promote stability and peace through its military alliances and economic investments, and has also been a vocal advocate for human rights and democracy in the region.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn conclusion, the United States has played a paradoxical role in the history of Asian peace since 1979. On the one hand, the country has been a significant force for stability and security in the region, providing military alliances and economic assistance to its Asian partners. On the other hand, the United States has also been a source of tension and conflict, particularly with China and North Korea. Despite these challenges, the United States has continued to play a significant role in the history of Asian peace, and will likely continue to do so in the future.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDimension\u003c\/strong\u003e: 235 x 156 (mm)\u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eISBN-13\u003c\/strong\u003e: 9780300257281\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Van Jackson","offers":[{"title":"Hardback","offer_id":44106274373882,"sku":"9780300257281","price":24.4,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0522\/4297\/2845\/products\/1675428672346_book.jpg?v=1675893792","url":"https:\/\/shulphink.com\/products\/pacific-power-paradox-american-statecraft-and-the-fate-of-the-asian-peace-9780300257281","provider":"Shulph Ink","version":"1.0","type":"link"}