{"product_id":"political-correctness-gone-mad","title":"Political Correctness Gone Mad?","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cblockquote\u003e\n\u003cbr\u003eThe Munk debate on political correctness examines whether it is an enemy of free speech or a weapon in the fight for equality. It features four thinkers who take on one of the most heated debates in the culture wars of the twenty-first century. \u003c\/blockquote\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\\n                                                            \u003cstrong\u003eFormat\u003c\/strong\u003e: Paperback \/ softback\u003cbr\u003e\\n                              \u003cstrong\u003eLength\u003c\/strong\u003e: 144 pages\u003cbr\u003e\\n                              \u003cstrong\u003ePublication date\u003c\/strong\u003e: 08 November 2018\u003cbr\u003e\\n                              \u003cstrong\u003ePublisher\u003c\/strong\u003e: Oneworld Publications\u003cbr\u003e\\n                          \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe concept of free speech is a fundamental human right that allows individuals to express their ideas and opinions without fear of censorship or repression. It is a cornerstone of democratic societies and is essential for the development of intellectual and social progress. Without free speech, there can be no true thought, as individuals are unable to challenge the status quo, question authority, or explore new ideas.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eHowever, the concept of free speech is not without its challenges. In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the rise of political correctness, which is often seen as a threat to free speech. Political correctness is the practice of avoiding language or behavior that is considered offensive or insensitive to certain groups of people, such as women, minorities, and LGBTQ+ individuals. While some argue that political correctness is necessary to promote equality and respect, others argue that it is a form of censorship that stifles intellectual debate and prevents individuals from expressing their true opinions.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe Munk debate on political correctness was a panel discussion that took place in 2018 at the University of Toronto's Munk School of Global Affairs. The debate was moderated by journalist and author Margaret Atwood, and featured four thinkers who took different positions on the issue of political correctness.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe first thinker to take the stage was Jordan Peterson, a Canadian psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. Peterson argued that political correctness is a threat to free speech because it encourages individuals to avoid expressing their opinions in order to avoid offending others. He argued that the rise of political correctness is a result of the postmodernist belief that there is no such thing as objective truth, and that all opinions are equal. Peterson also argued that political correctness is a form of censorship that prevents individuals from challenging the status quo and promoting social change.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe second thinker to take the stage was Michael Eric Dyson, a professor of sociology at Georgetown University and author of the book \"The Twilight of the Idols: How to Think Seriously About Religion.\" Dyson argued that political correctness is not a threat to free speech, but rather a tool in the fight for equality and social justice. He argued that political correctness is necessary to challenge the power of dominant groups and promote the voices of marginalized individuals. Dyson also argued that political correctness is not a form of censorship, but rather a form of respect and empathy for others.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe third thinker to take the stage was Jonathan Haidt, a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia and author of the book \"The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion.\" Haidt argued that political correctness is a threat to free speech because it encourages individuals to avoid expressing their opinions in order to avoid offending others. He argued that political correctness is a result of the moral Foundations Theory, which suggests that individuals are motivated by six basic moral values: fairness, loyalty, authority, purity, and sanctity. Haidt argued that political correctness is a form of moral policing that prevents individuals from expressing their true opinions and promotes a culture of conformity.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe fourth thinker to take the stage was Emily Mayhew, a journalist and author of the book \"The Bad News: How Politics Is Destroying Our Faith in Democracy.\" Mayhew argued that political correctness is not a threat to free speech, but rather a symptom of a deeper problem. She argued that political correctness is a result of the decline of trust in institutions and the rise of populism and nationalism. Mayhew argued that political correctness is necessary to address the underlying problems that are causing social division and promote a more inclusive and democratic society.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn conclusion, the Munk debate on political correctness was a fascinating and thought-provoking discussion that explored the complex relationship between free speech and political correctness. While some argued that political correctness is necessary to promote equality and respect, others argued that it is a form of censorship that stifles intellectual debate and prevents individuals from expressing their true opinions. The debate highlighted the importance of finding a balance between free speech and political correctness, and the need for individuals and institutions to engage in open and honest dialogue in order to promote social change and build a more inclusive and democratic society.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\\n                            \u003cstrong\u003eWeight\u003c\/strong\u003e: 106g\\n                            \u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDimension\u003c\/strong\u003e: 111 x 178 x 18 (mm)\\n                            \u003cbr\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eISBN-13\u003c\/strong\u003e: 9781786076045\\n                            \\n                          \u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Jordan B. Peterson,Stephen Fry,Michael Eric Dyson,Michelle Goldberg","offers":[{"title":"Paperback \/ softback","offer_id":44100277895418,"sku":"9781786076045","price":6.41,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0522\/4297\/2845\/products\/1e071e2c374795e93c14f2420deddf10.jpg?v=1626059624","url":"https:\/\/shulphink.com\/products\/political-correctness-gone-mad","provider":"Shulph Ink","version":"1.0","type":"link"}