Can We Know Anything?: A Debate

Michael Huemer and Bryan Frances debate whether we can gain knowledge of the world outside of our own minds, with Huemer arguing that we are entitled to presume that things are as they appear unless and until we acquire specific grounds for thinking otherwise. Frances argues that we should generally withhold judgment about controversial issues or at least greatly reduce our confidence.

Format: Hardback
Length: 210 pages
Publication date: 19 September 2023
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd

In this captivating book, Michael Huemer and Bryan Frances engage in a lively and thought-provoking debate about the nature of knowledge and its acquisition. They delve into the question of whether we can truly gain insights into the world beyond our own minds and explore various perspectives on this complex issue.

The debate begins with opening statements from both authors, setting the stage for the ensuing discussion. Frances argues that our lack of knowledge stems from various factors, such as the inability to rule out the possibility that we are merely brains in vats, being artificially stimulated to create an illusion of living in the real world. He suggests that without evidence against such possibilities, we cannot establish certainty about the external world. Huemer, on the other hand, takes a different stance. He maintains that we are entitled to presume that things are as they appear unless and until we acquire specific grounds for thinking otherwise. Huemer believes that we do not necessarily need to disprove all possible alternative explanations to gain knowledge of the external world.

The authors then move on to explore how we should approach controversial issues where experts persistently disagree. Frances advocates for a cautious approach, suggesting that we should generally withhold judgment or significantly reduce our confidence in such matters. He argues that people often exhibit overconfidence in their controversial views, which can lead to misunderstandings and misguided conclusions. Huemer, however, recognizes the potential for rational belief in controversial issues. He argues that while people are often overconfident, there are certain exceptions where one can hold on to controversial views based on rational arguments and evidence.

Throughout the debate, the authors present their arguments in a clear and concise manner, using standard philosophical terminology. They provide definitions of key concepts and terms to ensure that readers, regardless of their level of expertise, can easily grasp the discussions. Summary boxes are included to recap the main arguments made by each author, making the content more accessible and engaging. An annotated bibliography and glossary of specialized vocabulary are also provided to further enhance the reader's understanding of the topic.

In conclusion, this book offers a comprehensive and insightful exploration of the debate between Michael Huemer and Bryan Frances regarding the nature of knowledge and its acquisition. It provides readers with a deep understanding of the various perspectives on this topic and encourages them to engage in critical thinking and introspection. Whether you are a novice in philosophy or a seasoned scholar, this book will undoubtedly provide valuable insights and stimulate your intellectual curiosity.

Weight: 571g
Dimension: 216 x 138 (mm)
ISBN-13: 9780367208868