Skip to product information
1 of 1

Shulph Ink

Common Law, Civil Law, and Colonial Law: Essays in Comparative Legal History from the Twelfth to the Twentieth Centuries

Common Law, Civil Law, and Colonial Law: Essays in Comparative Legal History from the Twelfth to the Twentieth Centuries

Low Stock: Only 1 copies remaining
Regular price £21.15 GBP
Regular price £22.99 GBP Sale price £21.15 GBP
8% OFF Sold out
Tax included. Shipping calculated at checkout.

YOU SAVE £1.84

  • Condition: Brand new
  • UK Delivery times: Usually arrives within 2 - 3 working days
  • UK Shipping: Fee starts at £2.39. Subject to product weight & dimension
Trustpilot 4.5 stars rating  Excellent
We're rated excellent on Trustpilot.
  • More about Common Law, Civil Law, and Colonial Law: Essays in Comparative Legal History from the Twelfth to the Twentieth Centuries

The book Comparative Legal History: Common Law, Civil Law, and Colonial Law explores patterns in legal norms, processes, and practice across a broad chronological and geographical range, combining depth of analysis with historical contextualization.

Format: Paperback / softback
Length: 348 pages
Publication date: 16 February 2023
Publisher: Cambridge University Press


Common Law, Civil Law, and Colonial Law are all built upon the renowned observation made by legal historian F.W. Maitland that history involves comparison, and that those who ignore every system but their own rarely attain a comprehensive understanding of legal history. The extensive introduction in this book addresses the intellectual challenges posed by comparative approaches to legal history. This is followed by twelve essays derived from papers presented at the 24th British Legal History Conference. These essays explore patterns in legal norms, processes, and practice across an exceptionally broad chronological and geographical range. Carefully selected to provide a network of interconnections, they contribute to our better understanding of legal history by combining depth of analysis with historical contextualization. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

The study of law has a rich and complex history, shaped by various legal systems and traditions across different regions and time periods. One of the most influential legal historians of the 20th century, F.W. Maitland, made a profound observation that history involves comparison, and that those who ignore every system but their own often fail to grasp the broader concept of legal history. This observation serves as a guiding principle for scholars and researchers in the field of legal history.

In his works, Maitland emphasized the importance of comparing different legal systems to gain a deeper understanding of their development, evolution, and impact on society. He argued that by examining the similarities and differences between legal systems, one can gain insights into the broader trends and patterns that shape legal development. This comparative approach allows legal historians to explore the historical roots of legal norms, processes, and practices, and to understand how they have evolved over time.

One of the key challenges of comparative legal history is the need to overcome the barriers of language, culture, and historical context. Different legal systems have their own unique language, customs, and traditions, which can make it difficult to understand and analyze legal texts and documents from other cultures. Additionally, historical events and social movements can have a significant impact on legal systems, and it is essential to consider these factors when conducting comparative analysis.

To address these challenges, legal historians have developed a range of methods and approaches to comparative legal history. One of the most popular methods is the historical sociological approach, which combines historical analysis with social and cultural factors to understand the development of legal systems. This approach allows legal historians to explore the broader legal norms, processes, and practices in the broader social and cultural context, and to understand how they have been shaped by historical events and social movements.

Another method used in comparative legal history is the legal comparative method, which involves comparing legal systems based on specific criteria or principles. This method can be used to compare legal systems across different time periods, regions, or legal traditions. For example, legal historians can compare the legal systems of different countries based on their constitutional structures, legal traditions, or legal traditions. This method can be useful in identifying common trends and patterns in legal development, as well as in identifying areas of divergence and difference.

In addition to these methods, legal historians have also used other approaches to comparative legal history, such as the comparative legal history of the common law, civil law, and colonial law. This approach involves comparing the legal systems of different countries or regions based on their historical development, legal traditions, and legal institutions. This approach can be useful in understanding the broader historical context in which different legal systems have developed, and in identifying the broader trends and patterns that shape legal development.

One of the key benefits of comparative legal history is that it allows legal historians. Historians to gain a deeper understanding of the complex and multifaceted nature of legal development. By examining the similarities and differences between legal systems, historians can identify the broader trends and patterns that shape legal development, and can gain insights into the historical roots and traditions that have influenced the development of different legal systems. This understanding can be useful in developing new approaches to legal research and legal practice, as well as in developing new strategies for promoting legal reform and legal development.

In conclusion, the study of law has a rich and complex history, shaped by various legal systems and traditions across different regions and time periods. F.W. Maitland's observation that history involves comparison, and that those who ignore every system but their own often fail to grasp the broader concept of legal history, serves as a guiding principle. Comparative approaches to legal history offer a valuable tool for scholars and researchers in the field. By examining the similarities and differences between legal systems, historians can gain a deeper understanding of the complex and multifaceted nature of legal development, and can gain insights into the historical roots. This understanding can be useful in developing new approaches to legal research and legal practice, as well as in developing new strategies for promoting legal reform and legal development.


ISBN-13: 9781108925129

UK and International shipping information

UK Delivery and returns information:

  • Delivery within 2 - 3 days when ordering in the UK.
  • Shipping fee for UK customers from £2.39. Fully tracked shipping service available.
  • Returns policy: Return within 30 days of receipt for full refund.

International deliveries:

Shulph Ink now ships to Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, India, Luxembourg Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain, Netherlands, New Zealand, United Arab Emirates, United States of America.

  • Delivery times: within 5 - 10 days for international orders.
  • Shipping fee: charges vary for overseas orders. Only tracked services are available for most international orders. Some countries have untracked shipping options.
  • Customs charges: If ordering to addresses outside the United Kingdom, you may or may not incur additional customs and duties fees during local delivery.
View full details