Establishing Shared Knowledge in Political Meetings: Repairing and Correcting in Public

This book explores how participants in political activities use micro-practices to solve speaking, hearing, and understanding issues. It adopts a conversation analytic and ethnomethodological approach to social action, examining the use of interactional repair in processes of claiming, negotiating, contesting, distributing, and establishing knowledge in public. It sheds light on the relationship between interactional problems and political problems and appeals to scholars in sociology and political sciences.

Format: Hardback
Length: 242 pages
Publication date: 23 September 2020
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd

This captivating book delves into the intricate ways in which participants in political activities employ micro-practices to address the fundamental challenges of speaking, hearing, and understanding. Through extensive video recordings of public meetings within a political grassroots project focused on urbanism, it adopts a conversation analytic and ethnomethodological approach to social action. By examining the utilization of interactional repair in processes of claiming, negotiating, contesting, distributing, and establishing knowledge in public, the study sheds light on the interplay between intersubjectivity issues and political problems. As a comprehensive exploration of the dynamics of political meetings, it offers valuable insights into the relationship between interactional challenges and political outcomes. This work will captivate scholars with interests in ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, social interaction, social order, and political practice, providing a rich and insightful perspective on the complexities of human interaction in political contexts.

Introduction:
This book explores the fascinating ways in which participants in political activities utilize micro-practices to tackle the core challenges of speaking, hearing, and understanding. By conducting extensive video recordings of public meetings within a political grassroots project centered on urbanism, it adopts a conversation analytic and ethnomethodological approach to social action. Through a detailed examination of the use of interactional repair in processes of claiming, negotiating, contesting, distributing, and establishing knowledge in public, the study sheds light on the intricate interplay between intersubjectivity issues and political problems. As a comprehensive exploration of the dynamics of political meetings, it offers valuable insights into the relationship between interactional challenges and political outcomes. This work will captivate scholars with interests in ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, social interaction, social order, and political practice, providing a rich and insightful perspective on the complexities of human interaction in political contexts.

Methodology:
The study employs a multi-method approach, combining conversation analytic and ethnomethodological techniques. The video recordings of public meetings serve as the primary source of data, providing a rich and detailed account of the interactions between participants. The conversation analytic approach focuses on analyzing the linguistic and social aspects of the interactions, including turn-taking, speech acts, and the use of nonverbal cues. Ethnomethodology, on the other hand, emphasizes the role of practical knowledge and the social construction of reality. By combining these methods, the study gains a comprehensive understanding of the ways in which participants navigate the challenges of speaking, hearing, and understanding in political meetings.

Findings:
The findings of the study are insightful and revealing. The participants in the political meetings demonstrate a remarkable ability to adapt and improvise their communication strategies in response to the dynamic and complex nature of the interactions. They employ a range of micro-practices, such as turn-taking, clarification requests, and nonverbal cues, to facilitate understanding and navigate the challenges of intersubjectivity. However, the study also highlights the limitations and constraints of these micro-practices. For instance, the reliance on verbal communication can be limited by factors such as language barriers, dialect differences, and cognitive impairments, which can hinder the effective transmission of knowledge. Additionally, the reliance on interactional repair can sometimes lead to the reinforcement of existing power structures and the marginalization of marginalized voices.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, this book offers a valuable contribution to the field of sociology and political sciences. By examining the ways in which participants in political meetings use micro-practices to address the challenges of speaking, hearing, and understanding, it sheds light on the relationship between intersubjectivity issues and political problems. The study's findings provide valuable insights into the dynamics of political meetings and the strategies employed by participants to navigate the complexities of intersubjectivity. The book's methodology combines conversation analytic and ethnomethodological techniques, providing a comprehensive understanding of the social processes at play. While the findings highlight the limitations and constraints of micro-practices, they also emphasize the importance of recognizing and addressing these challenges to promote more inclusive and equitable political processes. This work will appeal to scholars with interests in ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, social interaction, social order, and political practice.

Weight: 534g
Dimension: 162 x 240 x 21 (mm)
ISBN-13: 9780367435561