Indirect Rule: The Making of US International Hierarchy

Indirect rule is a mode of rule where an allied group within a client state adopts policies preferred by a dominant state in exchange for support. It has been used by the US in the Caribbean, Central America, Western Europe, and the Arab Middle East. David A. Lake's book explores how indirect rule is more likely to occur when the specific assets at risk are large and governance costs are low, but its consequences, such as anti-Americanism, reveal its shortcomings.

Format: Paperback / softback
Length: 282 pages
Publication date: 22 January 2024
Publisher: Cornell University Press

Indirect rule is a fascinating and complex concept that delves into the intricate ways in which states exercise authority over other nations, often without direct control. This mode of rule has played a significant role in shaping domestic and international politics throughout history, particularly in the context of US foreign relations.

One of the key features of indirect rule is the involvement of an allied group within a client state, which adopts policies preferred by a dominant state in exchange for the support and protection of the dominant state. This arrangement allows the dominant state to exert influence over its client state without directly controlling its government or military.

Indirect rule has been employed by various nations throughout history, including the United States. In the case of the United States, indirect rule has been particularly prevalent in the Caribbean, Central America, Western Europe, and the Arab Middle East. The United States has often used this method to promote its interests and influence in these regions, often by supporting authoritarian regimes or opposing left-wing movements.

However, indirect rule is not without its criticisms. One of the main concerns is that it can lead to the erosion of democracy and human rights in the client state. Authoritarian regimes that are supported by the dominant state may use indirect rule to suppress opposition and maintain their power. This can result in the repression of civil liberties, the limitation of political freedoms, and the denial of basic human rights to the people of the client state.

Another criticism of indirect rule is that it can create resentment and opposition within the client state. The people of the client state may feel that their sovereignty is being undermined by the dominant state, which is exerting influence through an allied group within their own government. This can lead to anti-Americanism and other forms of opposition to the United States, which can have negative consequences for US foreign policy.

Despite these criticisms, indirect rule remains a significant mechanism of international hierarchy. It allows dominant states to exert influence over their client states without directly controlling their governments or military. However, it is important for dominant states to exercise caution and respect for the sovereignty and human rights of their client states.

In conclusion, indirect rule is a complex and multifaceted concept that has played a significant role in shaping domestic and international politics throughout history. While it has its advantages, such as promoting stability and influencing regional politics, it also has its drawbacks, such as the erosion of democracy and human rights. As the United States continues to engage in foreign policy, it is important to consider the implications of indirect rule and to work towards promoting democracy and human rights in all of its interactions with other nations.

Weight: 428g
Dimension: 152 x 228 x 21 (mm)
ISBN-13: 9781501773747