Network Publicy Governance - On Privacy and the Informational Self

The information age has created a conflict between data-driven society and privacy demands. Andréa Belliger and David J. Krieger propose information as a common good and redefine the individual as an informational self in networks of humans and nonhumans. Privacy is replaced by publicity, and data use and protection are governed by governance.

Format: Paperback / softback
Length: 170 pages
Publication date: 08 December 2021
Publisher: Transcript Verlag

The Information Age has sparked a significant clash between proponents of a data-driven society, who advocate for the collection and analysis of vast amounts of personal information to optimize societal outcomes, and those who prioritize the protection of individual freedom, autonomy, and dignity through privacy. This conflict arises from the modern Western opposition between individualism and collectivism, as well as a self-perception of humans as autonomous, rational subjects with an inherent right to informational self-determination.

To address this complex dilemma, Andréa Belliger and David J. Krieger propose a novel theory of information as a common good. They redefine the individual as an informational self who exists within networks composed of both humans and nonhumans. In this framework, privacy is replaced by publicity, and the focus shifts towards governance rather than government in addressing issues related to data use and protection.

The proponents of a data-driven society argue that by leveraging data, societies can make informed decisions, improve efficiency, and address social challenges more effectively. They emphasize the importance of transparency, accountability, and informed consent in data collection and usage. They argue that privacy is not an absolute right but rather a trade-off that can be achieved through appropriate regulations and policies.

On the other hand, those who prioritize privacy argue that personal information is sensitive and should be protected from unauthorized access, use, and disclosure. They fear that the accumulation of vast amounts of data can be used for surveillance, discrimination, and other forms of harm. They advocate for stronger privacy laws, robust data protection mechanisms, and greater individual control over their data.

The conflict between a data-driven society and demands for privacy is not a new one. However, the rise of big data, artificial intelligence, and other technological advancements has intensified the debate and raised new ethical and societal challenges. As societies navigate this complex terrain, it is crucial to find a balance between the benefits of data-driven innovation and the protection of individual rights and freedoms.

One potential solution to this conflict is the development of a comprehensive data governance framework. This framework would involve establishing clear rules and regulations for the collection, use, and protection of personal information. It would also involve the establishment of independent oversight bodies to ensure that these rules are enforced and that individuals have access to their data and the ability to control how it is used.

In addition, it is important to promote a culture of privacy and data literacy among individuals. This would involve educating people about the risks and benefits of sharing personal information, as well as providing them with tools and resources to protect their data. It would also involve promoting transparency and accountability in data use, so that individuals can understand how their data is being used and make informed decisions about their privacy.

Another potential solution is the development of new technologies and practices that prioritize privacy and security. For example, encryption technologies can be used to protect personal information from unauthorized access, while artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to analyze data without compromising individual privacy.

In conclusion, the Information Age has brought about a growing conflict between proponents of a data-driven society and demands for privacy. The causes of this conflict are rooted in the modern Western opposition between individual and society and a self-understanding of the human as an autonomous rational subject with an inalienable right to informational self-determination. By proposing a theory of information as a common good and redefining the individual as an informational self who exists in networks composed of both humans and nonhumans, Andréa Belliger and David J. Krieger offer a novel approach to addressing this complex dilemma. However, finding a balance between the benefits of data-driven innovation and the protection of individual rights and freedoms requires a comprehensive and collaborative effort.

Weight: 666g
Dimension: 226 x 147 x 15 (mm)
ISBN-13: 9783837642131