On Artists

The #MeToo movement is challenging the stereotype that creativity is linked to eccentricity, madness, addiction, and excess, and artists must be held to the same standards of conduct as everyone else. However, it raises the question of what becomes of the work that remains when an artist is denounced.

\n Format: Paperback / softback
\n \n Publication date: 07 May 2019
\n Publisher: Melbourne University Press
\n

The #MeToo movement is challenging a long-held notion that has excused inappropriate behavior for years: being creative is synonymous with eccentricity, madness, addiction, and excess. Artists cannot now be given a pass from the ethical standards that govern us all. However, what happens to the artwork that remains if we condemn the artist?

The #MeToo movement has brought about a significant shift in the cultural landscape, challenging the notion that creativity is inherently linked to eccentricity, madness, addiction, and excess. For years, artists have been able to operate within a certain degree of autonomy, free from the constraints of mainstream society. However, this era of impunity is coming to an end.

The movement has exposed the prevalence of sexual misconduct and harassment in the arts industry, highlighting the need for greater accountability and transparency. It has prompted a widespread examination of the power dynamics and hierarchies that exist within artistic communities, as well as the cultural norms and expectations that perpetuate these behaviors.

One of the most significant impacts of the #MeToo movement is the increased scrutiny that artists are now facing. No longer can they be excused from the standards of conduct that apply to us all. Artists are now expected to be held accountable for their actions, just like any other professional. This includes a commitment to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in their work and to creating a safe and respectful environment for their colleagues and collaborators.

However, the movement has also raised questions about the future of artistic expression. If artists are held to such high standards of conduct, what becomes of the work that remains? Will it be tainted by the misconduct of the artist, or will it be seen as a testament to their resilience and creativity?

There is no easy answer to this question. On the one hand, it is important to hold artists accountable for their actions and to ensure that they are held to the same standards as any other professional. On the other hand, art is a form of expression that should be free from censorship and judgment.

One approach to navigating this dilemma is to focus on the work itself, rather than the artist. Art is a powerful tool for conveying emotions, ideas, and experiences, and it can continue to be valuable even if the artist behind it has engaged in misconduct. By examining the themes and messages of the artwork, we can appreciate its artistic merit and its ability to connect with audiences on a deep level.

Another approach is to support artists who are committed to promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in their work. By purchasing their artwork, attending their exhibitions, and promoting their work to others, we can help to create a more inclusive and supportive artistic community.

Ultimately, the #MeToo movement is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a nuanced and thoughtful response. It is important to recognize the importance of holding artists accountable for their actions while also respecting the freedom of artistic expression. By working together, we can create a more equitable and inclusive artistic community that values diversity, equity, and inclusion.

\n Weight: 72g\n
Dimension: 110 x 149 x 12 (mm)\n
ISBN-13: 9780522875256\n \n