The Dyslexia Debate Revisited

Children struggle to master reading in every country and language, and The Dyslexia Debate examined the problematic interpretation of the term dyslexia and its efficacy as a diagnosis. Ten years on, The Dyslexia Debate Revisited reflects on the changes in dyslexia assessment and treatment over the last decade, including the introduction of dyslexia legislation in many US states. The authors strive to promote a shared understanding of reading difficulties and emphasize the importance of providing timely and appropriate intervention and support to anyone who faces difficulties with learning to read.

Format: Paperback / softback
Length: 456 pages
Publication date: 18 April 2024
Publisher: Cambridge University Press

In every country and language, a significant number of children face challenges in acquiring the skill of reading. In 2014, The Dyslexia Debate delved into the problematic interpretation of the term "dyslexia" and raised questions about its effectiveness as a diagnosis. Ten years later, The Dyslexia Debate Revisited takes a retrospective look at the changes in dyslexia assessment and treatment over the past decade, including the introduction of dyslexia legislation in many US states. In response to the critical challenges they initially posed, Julian G. Elliott and Elena L. Grigorenko explore why existing dyslexia conceptions and assessment practices continue to be highly appealing to professionals, individuals, and families, despite scientific critiques. Drawing from current scientific knowledge, the authors aim to promote a shared understanding of reading difficulties and emphasize the importance of providing timely and appropriate intervention and support to anyone facing challenges with learning to read.

In every country and language, a significant number of children face challenges in acquiring the skill of reading. In 2014, The Dyslexia Debate delved into the problematic interpretation of the term "dyslexia" and raised questions about its effectiveness as a diagnosis. Ten years later, The Dyslexia Debate Revisited takes a retrospective look at the changes in dyslexia assessment and treatment over the past decade, including the introduction of dyslexia legislation in many US states. In response to the critical challenges they initially posed, Julian G. Elliott and Elena L. Grigorenko explore why existing dyslexia conceptions and assessment practices continue to be highly appealing to professionals, individuals, and families, despite scientific critiques. Drawing from current scientific knowledge, the authors aim to promote a shared understanding of reading difficulties and emphasize the importance of providing timely and appropriate intervention and support to anyone facing challenges with learning to read.

Weight: 656g
Dimension: 152 x 228 x 28 (mm)
ISBN-13: 9781009078665