Skip to product information
1 of 1

John T. Aquino

Truth and Lives on Film: The Legal Problems of Depicting Real Persons and Events in a Fictional Medium

Truth and Lives on Film: The Legal Problems of Depicting Real Persons and Events in a Fictional Medium

Regular price £38.35 GBP
Regular price £39.95 GBP Sale price £38.35 GBP
Sale Sold out
Tax included. Shipping calculated at checkout.
  • Condition: Brand new
  • UK Delivery times: Usually arrives within 2 - 3 working days
  • UK Shipping: Fee starts at £2.39. Subject to product weight & dimension
Dispatches within 7 to 10 working days
Trustpilot 4.5 stars rating  Excellent
We're rated excellent on Trustpilot.
  • More about Truth and Lives on Film: The Legal Problems of Depicting Real Persons and Events in a Fictional Medium


Movie studios have been sued for depicting real people and events, but filmmakers have altered details to make narratives more workable and compelling. This expanded second edition provides an updated history of legal issues surrounding the on-screen embellishment of reality, with seventeen courtroom dramas analyzed and a concluding chapter on actors who sought exclusive rights to fictionalized characters.

Format: Paperback / softback
Length: 277 pages
Publication date: 20 June 2022
Publisher: McFarland & Co Inc


Since the Silent Era, movie studios have faced legal challenges for depicting real people and events. Filmmakers have traditionally modified the facts of true stories and real individuals, whether they are alive or deceased, to enhance the narrative's feasibility and captivate the audience. However, when truth and fantasy intertwine, the impact on people's lives can be profound, even catastrophic.

This revised and expanded second edition provides an updated account of legal concerns surrounding the on-screen embellishment of reality. It emphasizes significant court decisions and the use of disclaimers. Seventeen courtroom dramas are analyzed factually versus fictionally, with extensive coverage of the 1991 film "The Perfect Storm." A concluding chapter explores actors who became so closely associated with fictionalized characters that they sought exclusive rights to those personas.

Filmmakers have always been creative in adapting real-life events and people for the screen. In the early days of cinema, filmmakers often took liberties with the truth to create compelling stories. For example, in the 1920s, silent films were often based on historical events, but the filmmakers often added dramatic elements or changed the timeline to make the story more exciting.

However, as cinema became more sophisticated, filmmakers began to face legal challenges for misrepresenting real people and events. In the 1940s, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of New York Times v. Sullivan that public figures had a right to protection against defamatory statements. This ruling set a precedent for future cases involving the portrayal of real people in the media.

Over the years, there have been many notable cases involving the depiction of real people in movies. One of the most famous is the 1991 film "The Perfect Storm," which was based on the true story of the Andrea Gail, a fishing boat that was caught in a massive storm off the coast of Massachusetts in 1991. The film was critically acclaimed and earned several Academy Awards, but it also faced legal challenges from the family of the real-life captain of the Andrea Gail.

The family claimed that the film had misrepresented the captain's character and that it had caused them emotional distress. In 1997, a court ruled in favor of the family, finding that the film had violated their right to privacy. The ruling was a significant victory for the family and set a precedent for future cases involving the portrayal of real people in the media.

Another notable case is the 2006 film "The Da Vinci Code," which was based on the best-selling novel by Dan Brown. The film was controversial for its portrayal of historical figures, including Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church. The film's producers were sued by several groups, including the Catholic League and the Knights of Columbus, who claimed that the film had defamed their religion.

In 2007, a court ruled in favor of the producers, finding that the film was protected by the First Amendment. The ruling was a significant victory for the producers and set a precedent for future cases involving the portrayal of religious figures in the media.

Despite these legal challenges, filmmakers continue to take liberties in adapting real-life events and people for the screen. In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards documentaries and biopics, which aim to portray real people and events accurately and respectfully. These films often require extensive research and collaboration with the individuals or families involved in the story.

However, even in these types of films, filmmakers may face legal challenges if they misrepresent or embellish the truth. For example, in the 2015 film "The Imitation Game," which was based on the true story of Alan Turing, the filmmakers were criticized for their portrayal of Turing's homosexuality. Turing's family claimed that the film had misrepresented his character and that it had caused them emotional distress.

In conclusion, the depiction of real people and events in movies has been a complex and controversial issue throughout the history of cinema. While filmmakers have traditionally taken liberties.

This revised and expanded second edition provides an updated account of legal concerns surrounding the on-screen embellishment of reality. It emphasizes significant court decisions and the use of disclaimers. Seventeen courtroom dramas are analyzed factually versus fictionally, with extensive coverage of the 1991 film "The Perfect Storm." A concluding chapter explores actors who became so closely associated with fictionalized characters that they sought exclusive rights to those personas.

Filmmakers have always been creative in adapting real-life events and people for the screen. In the early days of cinema, filmmakers often took liberties with the truth to create compelling stories. For example, in the 1920s, silent films were often based on historical events, but the filmmakers often added dramatic elements or changed the timeline to make the story more exciting.

However, as cinema became more sophisticated, filmmakers began to face legal challenges for misrepresenting real people and events. In the 1940s, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of New York Times v. Sullivan that public figures had a right to protection against defamatory statements. This ruling set a precedent for future cases involving the portrayal of real people in the media.

Over the years, there have been many notable cases involving the depiction of real people in movies. One of the most famous is the 1991 film "The Perfect Storm," which was based on the true story of the Andrea Gail, a fishing boat that was caught in a massive storm off the coast of Massachusetts in 1991. The film was critically acclaimed and earned several Academy Awards, but it also faced legal challenges from the family of the real-life captain of the Andrea Gail.

The family claimed that the film had misrepresented the captain's character and that it had caused them emotional distress. In 1997, a court ruled in favor of the family, finding that the film had violated their right to privacy. The ruling was a significant victory for the family and set a precedent for future cases involving the portrayal of real people in the media.

Another notable case is the 2006 film "The Da Vinci Code," which was based on the best-selling novel by Dan Brown. The film was controversial for its portrayal of historical figures, including Jesus Christ and the Catholic Church. The film's producers were sued by several groups, including the Catholic League and the Knights of Columbus, who claimed that the film had defamed their religion.

In 2007, a court ruled in favor of the producers, finding that the film was protected by the First Amendment. The ruling was a significant victory for the producers and set a precedent for future cases involving the portrayal of religious figures in the media.

Despite these legal challenges, filmmakers continue to take liberties in adapting real-life events and people for the screen. In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards documentaries and biopics, which aim to portray real people and events accurately and respectfully. These films often require extensive research and collaboration with the individuals or families involved in the story.

However, even in these types of films, filmmakers may face legal challenges if they misrepresent or embellish the truth. For example, in the 2015 film "The Imitation Game," which was based on the true story of Alan Turing, the filmmakers were criticized for their portrayal of Turing's homosexuality. Turing's family claimed that the film had misrepresented his character and that it had caused them emotional distress.

In conclusion, the depiction of real people and events in movies has been a complex and controversial issue throughout the history of cinema. While filmmakers have traditionally taken liberties.

Weight: 151g
Dimension: 229 x 152 (mm)
ISBN-13: 9781476688237
Edition number: 2 Revised edition

UK and International shipping information

UK Delivery and returns information:

  • Delivery within 2 - 3 days when ordering in the UK.
  • Shipping fee for UK customers from £2.39. Fully tracked shipping service available.
  • Returns policy: Return within 30 days of receipt for full refund.

International deliveries:

Shulph Ink now ships to Australia, Canada, France, Ireland, Italy, Germany, Spain, Netherlands, New Zealand and the United States of America.

  • Delivery times: within 5 - 20 business days when ordering to France, Germany, Ireland, Spain, Canada and the United States. Up to 30 business days for Australia and New Zealand.
  • Shipping fee: charges vary for overseas orders. Only tracked services are available for international orders.
  • Customs charges: If ordering to addresses outside the United Kingdom, you may or may not incur additional customs and duties fees during local delivery.
View full details