Radical Democracy and Populism: A Thin Red Line?

This book explores the differences between populism and radical democratic theories, arguing that populism departs from democratic principles and cannot be reconciled with "illiberal democracy," the "democratic myth," or crude electoral majoritarianism. It provides a clear conceptual distinction between the two and is of great interest to scholars studying democratic theory, contemporary challenges to democracy, and the rise of populist discourse.

Format: Hardback
Length: 320 pages
Publication date: 03 March 2022
Publisher: Springer Nature Switzerland AG

This comprehensive comparative analysis delves into the intricate relationship between populism and radical democratic theories, exploring the dividing line that separates these two conceptions of 'people' and 'popular sovereignty.' While populism is often perceived as having a connection to democracy, this book argues that it significantly deviates from democratic theory and practice, occupying a distinct conceptual space. It cannot be reconciled with concepts such as "illiberal democracy," the "democratic myth," crude electoral majoritarianism, or used as a means to conceal undemocratic policies under the guise of democratic justifications. These positions, prevalent in the literature, are challenged based on the dividing line identified, which begins to unfold at the level of the conception of 'the people' or the sovereign, assumed by both populists and democrats.

This book holds immense value for scholars engaged in the study of democratic theory, addressing contemporary challenges to democracy, and analyzing the rise of populist discourse. By providing a deeper understanding of populism as a political phenomenon and defining it as a self-standing concept in political theory, it contributes to a more comprehensive analysis of these critical issues.

The study of populism and radical democratic theories is a crucial endeavor in contemporary political discourse. Populism, characterized by its appeal to the common people and its rejection of established political elites, has gained significant traction in recent years. At the same time, radical democratic theories emphasize the importance of direct democracy, social equality, and the empowerment of marginalized groups. This comparative analysis aims to explore the similarities and differences between these two approaches, examining how they conceptualize the role of the people and the state in democratic governance.

One of the key similarities between populism and radical democratic theories is their emphasis on the importance of popular sovereignty. Both perspectives argue that the people should have a direct say in the decisions that affect their lives. Populists argue that this can be achieved through the establishment of direct democratic institutions, such as referenda and participatory budgeting, while radical democrats advocate for the creation of participatory political systems that allow for the direct involvement of citizens in decision-making processes.

However, there are also significant differences between these two approaches. Populism often portrays itself as a grassroots movement that represents the interests of the ordinary people against the elite. Radical democratic theories, on the other hand, emphasize the importance of social and economic equality as a foundation for democratic governance. Radical democrats believe that the state should play a proactive role in promoting social and economic justice, while populists often view the state as an adversary that should be limited in its powers.

Another difference between populism and radical democratic theories is their approach to political representation. Populists often argue that representative democracy is flawed and that direct democracy is the only way to ensure that the interests of the people are represented. Radical democratic theories, on the other hand, recognize the value of representative democracy but argue that it should be more inclusive and responsive to the needs of marginalized groups.

Furthermore, there are differences in the ideologies and values that underpin these two approaches. Populism is often associated with nationalism, anti-immigration sentiment, and a desire to protect traditional values and institutions. Radical democratic theories, on the other hand, are often rooted in social and economic equality, human rights, and a commitment to social justice.

Despite these differences, there are also areas of overlap between populism and radical democratic theories. Both perspectives emphasize the importance of democracy, the need to address social and economic inequality, and the importance of citizen participation in decision-making processes. Additionally, both approaches have been influenced by the historical context in which they have developed. For example, the rise of populism in the 20th century was influenced by the economic and social challenges faced by many people, while radical democratic theories emerged in response to the oppressive regimes of the 20th century.

In conclusion, the study of populism and radical democratic theories is essential for understanding the dynamics of contemporary politics. While there are significant differences between these two approaches, there are also areas of overlap and common ground. By examining these similarities and differences, we can better understand the challenges and opportunities facing democratic governance in the 21st century.

Weight: 664g
Dimension: 235 x 155 (mm)
ISBN-13: 9783030849689
Edition number: 1st ed. 2022